![]() Examples of things which would change an airplanes CG are fuel burn off, bomb dropped, or a cargo shift. The CG, center of gravity, is fixed and unless a weight/load moves within the airplane it never changes. I will throw a correction to an answer given above: The pilots are applying "up" elevator and increasing the angle of attack of the wing, thus increasing lift. The answer is it only appears the B52 is not rotating. Once in flight the airplane's rate of climb stabilizes, or becomes constant when lift = gravity/weight (the opposing force). This means unless the lift exceeds the weight an airplane will never leave the ground. When lift = weight/gravity the airplane is in a stable state, which means the rate of climb or descent will be constant. ![]() The B52 does "rotate" on takeoff just not to the degree of what seems normal for such a large jet.Īll airplanes must produce lift that is greater than the opposing force of gravity/its weight for it to leave the runway. The two open doors under the cockpit were for the pilot and navigator: Their downward-ejecting seats would be lowered on cables for the crew to be strapped in at ground level, then winching themselves into place. ![]() Myasishchyev M-50 with extended front gear strut (picture source). When the aircraft reached 300 km/h, the forward gear rapidly extended to rotate it to 10°. To solve the problem, the engineers devised what they called the "galloping bicycle". They also had to put the bomb bay into the center fuselage and the main gear had to be placed so far aft that the M-50 could not be rotated the usual way with the elevator. The Russian design bureau Myasishchyev found a different solution for their M-50 supersonic bomber in the mid-50s. Here the forward and aft gear of the B-47 have been replaced by pairs of gears to distribute the load over eight wheels and the outriggers are positioned outside of the outer engine pair, but the general gear configuration is fairly similar. Note the outriggers between the inner pair of engines - those were needed to keep the aircraft level on the ground.ī-52 in flight with gear down (picture source). The downside is more drag during the take-off run, since the wing produces more lift, but this could be tolerated in a strategic bomber with air refueling capabilities.ī-47 on approach with gear down and drag chute deployed (picture source). Due to the powerful fowler flaps the attitude in cruise and at slow speed could be made identical. In both designs, two pairs of landing gears were chosen, one pair ahead and one pair aft of the bomb bay, and the aircraft lost its ability to rotate for takeoff. ![]() This problem existed already during the development of the 6-engined B-47 a few years before. Since the bombs will be dropped somewhere along a bombing mission, dropping them should not upset the balance of the aircraft, so no compromise was possible.ī-52 cutaway drawing showing the two bomb bays in the center of the fuselage (picture source) The main landing gear normally needs to be close to the center of gravity (slightly behind for a tricycle gear, slightly ahead for a taildragger), but this space was needed for the massive bomb bay. Wing sweep (for high cruise Mach numbers) in combination with a high aspect ratio of the wing (for low induced drag) made it impossible to place the landing gear in the wing, so it had to be integrated into the fuselage. The reason was to give the bombs the place close to the center of gravity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |